<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fiercecio.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/techwatch</link>
 <description>Front Page Tech Watch News Posts</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Study claims Internet capacity growing faster than usage</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/study-claims-internet-capacity-growing-faster-usage/2008-09-05?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FCTW0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For those concerned that the Internet is running headlong into a monstrous traffic crunch, Internet monitor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegeography.com/&quot;&gt;TeleGeography Research&lt;/a&gt; has released a report that should give some reassurance on this front.&amp;nbsp;TeleGeography notes that while Internet traffic grew 53 percent&amp;nbsp;between mid-2007 and mid-2008, Internet capacity grew faster, resulting in lower utilization on many Internet backbones.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, utilization on the international links in the United States, Canada and Latin America rose as demand for the outpaced deployment of additional Internet bandwidth.&amp;nbsp;Despite this fact, the findings could&amp;nbsp;halt an&amp;nbsp;effort in the U.S. that has&amp;nbsp;put pressure on Internet Service Providers (ISP) to stop any form of bandwidth throttling.&amp;nbsp;Then again, it could be argued that the only factor preventing even faster growth in Internet usage is the use of throttling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more on the growth of Internet traffic:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;InformationWeek &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/reporting/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210500083&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/study-claims-internet-capacity-growing-faster-usage/2008-09-05#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/internet-capacity">Internet Capacity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/internet-monitor">Internet Monitor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/internet-service-providers-0">Internet Service Providers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/internet-traffic">Internet Traffic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/internet-usage-0">Internet Usage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:18:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65055 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dell looking at selling its factories</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/dell-looking-selling-its-factories/2008-09-05?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FCTW0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dell is attempting to sell its computer factories located around the world as part of an overhaul of its production strategy.&amp;nbsp;Reports are coming in that Dell is in negotiation with &quot;major contract manufacturers&quot; to sell of most of its facilities.&amp;nbsp;This could happen as early as within the next 18 months, according to reports.&amp;nbsp;Other factories would just close.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The swift transition away from built-to-order PCs--or corporate customers ordering large numbers of desktop PCs--to laptops has left Dell, once the industry leader, lagging behind rivals.&amp;nbsp;By outsourcing the manufacturing, Dell hopes to bring down manufacturing costs.&amp;nbsp;Indeed, investors were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/1998/09/05/dell_to_open_third_factory/&quot;&gt;left disappointed&lt;/a&gt; by quarterly profits that were reported as down 18 percent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more on how Dell is doing:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;Wall Street Journal &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122058183649202581.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/dell-looking-selling-its-factories/2008-09-05#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/dell">Dell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/factories-0">Factories</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/laptop">Laptops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/channel/it-outsourcing">Outsourcing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/pcs">PCs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/transition">transition</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:14:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65054 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sun releases second version of xVM VirtualBox</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/sun-releases-second-version-xvm-virtualbox/2008-09-05?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FCTW0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The second version of xVM&#039;s VirtualBox desktop virtualization software has been released.&amp;nbsp;VirtualBox is a general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware that is targeted for server, desktop and embedded use.&amp;nbsp;This open-sourced software supports Solaris OS, OpenSolaris, Windows, Macintosh OS X, and Linux.&amp;nbsp;Sun claims that it is finding traction, especially among Apple Macintosh users.&amp;nbsp;According to the Steve Wilson, VP of xVM at Sun, &quot;VirtualBox has deep integration with the Mac operating system&#039;s approach to networking.&quot; Round the clock support for VirtualBox is available for enterprise customers.&amp;nbsp;Alternatively, you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techweb.com/encyclopedia/defineterm.jhtml?term=download&amp;amp;x=&amp;amp;y=&quot;&gt;download the code here&lt;/a&gt;, or visit its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.virtualbox.org/&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To read up more about this story:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;InformationWeek &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/server_virtualization/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210500084&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/sun-releases-second-version-xvm-virtualbox/2008-09-05#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/linux">Linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/macintosh-os-x">Macintosh OS X</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/open-sourced-software">open-sourced software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/opensolaris">OpenSolaris</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/solaris-os">Solaris OS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/steve-wilson">Steve Wilson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/virtualbox">Virtualbox</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/virtualization-software">virtualization software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/x86">x86</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/xvm">xVM</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:10:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65053 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Site owners complain about new search engine Cuil</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/site-owners-complain-about-new-search-engine-cuil/2008-09-02?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FCTW0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Barely more than a month after the launch of &quot;Google Killer&quot; Cuil, site owners are saying that its Twiceler indexing bot is causing mayhem on their sites with its overzealous indexing.&amp;nbsp;One user even complained that the Twiceler robot visited &quot;nearly 70,000 times&quot; and in the process leeched off &quot;nearly 2GB&quot; of traffic prior to it being blocked.&amp;nbsp;Others note that Cuil appears to repeatedly hit a site with pseudo-random URLs in attempts to find pages that are not linked directly to it.&amp;nbsp;Cuil&#039;s Operational Engineer noted in defense of the search engine&amp;nbsp;that Twiceler is an experimental crawler and it is important that robots.txt is obeyed.&amp;nbsp;On a more sinister note, he also claimed that a number of crawlers appear to be masquerading as Twiceler.&amp;nbsp;To be sure, site owners can consult the company&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cuil.com/info/webmaster_info/&quot;&gt;IP address page&lt;/a&gt; to verify that it really is&amp;nbsp;Cuil.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To find out more about the Cuil search engine:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;TechCrunch &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-cuil-killing-websites/&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/site-owners-complain-about-new-search-engine-cuil/2008-09-02#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/crawler">Crawler</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/cuil">Cuil</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/search-engine">search engine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/traffic">traffic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/twiceler">Twiceler</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:10:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65023 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Intel adds low-cost quad-core processor to its lineup</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/intel-adds-low-cost-quad-core-processor-its-lineup/2008-09-02?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FCTW0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Intel has updated its processor lineup with low-cost quad-core and Core 2 Duo desktop processors.&amp;nbsp;The quad-core Q8200 is listed at $224, and is the lowest-priced quad-core chip currently offered by Intel.&amp;nbsp;The 45-nanometer processor comes with a clock speed of 2.33 GHz, 4MB of cache memory and runs off a speedy front-side bus of 1333 MHz.&amp;nbsp;The new Core 2 Duo processor, the E5200, will be priced at $84 and come with a clock speed of 2.2 GHz, 512K of cache, as well as 800 MHz front-side bus.&amp;nbsp;The new 2.2 GHz Celeron D processor is listed at $53.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more on this:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;CNET &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10029830-64.html?tag=mncol&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/intel-adds-low-cost-quad-core-processor-its-lineup/2008-09-02#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/celeron-d">Celeron D</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/intel">Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/intel-processor-0">Intel Processor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/quad-core-0">Quad Core</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:04:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65022 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>One-sided EULAs dealt a blow</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/one-sided-eulas-dealt-blow/2008-09-02?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FCTW0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In a unanimous ruling, the Washington Supreme Court has affirmed that AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s service terms are &quot;unconscionable.&quot;&amp;nbsp;What that means is that the terms are such that no reasonable person would agree to them should they be aware of their full scope.&amp;nbsp;The case came about when a customer who signed up for AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s long distance service was billed a monthly utility tax specific to the city of Wenatchee, even though the man himself lives outside the above-mentioned city.&amp;nbsp;The man took AT&amp;amp;T to task by alleging violations of Washington&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=19.86&quot;&gt;consumer-protection laws&lt;/a&gt;, triggering a string of events that resulted in the court ruling that the contract to be invalid in its entirety.&amp;nbsp;Though the issues in this case apply only to the Washington State, and also rely on Washington&#039;s Consumer Protection Act, perhaps this could mark the beginning of the end of restrictive, one-sided service agreements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more on this legal case:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;Ars Technica &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080901-washington-court-deals-a-blow-to-unconscionable-eulas.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/one-sided-eulas-dealt-blow/2008-09-02#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/city-wenatchee">City Of Wenatchee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/consumer-protection-act">Consumer Protection Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/legal-case">Legal Case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/washington-state">Washington State</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/washington-supreme-court">Washington Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:02:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65021 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft patents &#039;page up&#039; and &#039;page down&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/microsoft-patents-page-and-page-down/2008-09-02?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FCTW0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft&amp;nbsp;was granted a patent on the &amp;lsquo;page up&#039; and &amp;lsquo;page down&#039; keystroke just a couple of weeks ago.&amp;nbsp;As noted by &lt;em&gt;ZDNet,&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;amp;d=PALL&amp;amp;p=1%3Cbr%20%3E%3C/a%3E%20&amp;amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&amp;amp;r=1&amp;amp;f=G&amp;amp;l=50&amp;amp;s1=7,415,666.PN.&amp;amp;OS=PN/7,415%3Cbr%20/%3E%20,666&amp;amp;RS=PN/7,415,666&quot;&gt;US patent number 7,415,666&lt;/a&gt; describes &quot;a method and system in a document viewer for scrolling a substantially exact increment in a document, such as one page, regardless of whether the zoom is such that some, all or one page is currently being viewed.&quot;&amp;nbsp;The patent was applied for by Microsoft in 2005, though I seem to remember seeing it on my first IBM-PC almost 15 years ago.&amp;nbsp;Personally, I doubt Microsoft will be able to leverage this patent to milk any royalties.&amp;nbsp;In all likelihood, the company is simply building up a war chest that it can use to mitigate patent litigation by other tech companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more on this story:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;ZDNet &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.com/2424-9595_22-218626.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/microsoft-patents-page-and-page-down/2008-09-02#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/microsoft">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/page-down">page down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/page">page up</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/patent-litigation">Patent Litigation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/patent">Patents</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:57:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65020 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
